March and March Activism Sparks Tensions Over Potential Border Shutdown Protests
Key Takeaways
- March and March is a South African civic group targeting illegal immigration through protest and potential border shutdowns.
- The group previously gained notoriety for gatekeeping public health facilities, demanding IDs from patients to restrict access.
- Their rhetoric is linked to broader xenophobic trends and the political influence of parties like the Patriotic Alliance.
- A border shutdown would threaten regional trade and exacerbate diplomatic tensions between South Africa and Zimbabwe.
- The movement exploits public frustration over unemployment and economic stagnation to justify its extrajudicial activities.
Index Summary
The political landscape in South Africa has become increasingly volatile throughout 2026 as the civic organisation known as March and March continues to intensify its rhetoric regarding illegal immigration. Emerging in early 2024, this group has rapidly evolved from a fringe movement into a significant force that challenges the status quo of migration policy. Their recent focus on a potential shutdown at the border with Zimbabwe has sent shockwaves through both local communities and international observers. The group, which draws ideological inspiration from Operation Dudula and the Patriotic Alliance, has made its intentions clear through the slogan Mabahambe, meaning they must go. This is not merely a protest movement in the traditional sense, but a highly organized effort to exert pressure on government institutions and influence the national discourse on sovereignty and border control.
What makes this development particularly concerning is the history of the group, which has previously targeted public health facilities. In 2025, volunteers from the movement stationed themselves outside clinics and hospitals, including Addington Hospital and R. K. Khan Hospital, demanding that patients produce identification documents before entry. This gatekeeping tactic was a direct challenge to the constitutional rights of individuals seeking medical care, regardless of their nationality. While the leadership of the movement announced the cessation of these clinic-based activities at the start of 2026, the underlying sentiment has not dissipated. Instead, it has shifted toward the border, where the group now contemplates a more disruptive form of activism. The transition from local health facility monitoring to a broader, nationalistic border shutdown strategy represents a significant escalation in their operational scope.
Reports from the Daily Maverick highlight that while the country has managed to avoid a repeat of the widespread unrest seen in July 2021, the atmosphere remains brittle. The movement claims that their fight is far from over, and their persistent presence in the public eye suggests that they are not interested in quiet diplomacy. The government, meanwhile, finds itself in a precarious position. Years of what critics describe as denial regarding the depth of the illegal immigration crisis have left the African National Congress struggling to regain control of the narrative. The frustration among the populace is palpable, and groups like March and March are effectively capitalizing on this disillusionment to build their base of support.
International media outlets, including ABC News, have noted that the growing protests are contributing to an environment where many immigrants feel compelled to leave South Africa. This exodus is not just a result of economic hardship but a direct response to the xenophobic undertones that have become increasingly common in public discourse. The situation at the border is particularly sensitive, as it serves as the primary gateway for trade and human movement between South Africa and its northern neighbors. A shutdown, even a partial one, would have severe economic consequences for the region, potentially disrupting supply chains and exacerbating existing diplomatic tensions.
One must consider the broader implications of this movement. By framing the issue of illegal immigration as a matter of national survival, March and March have successfully tapped into a vein of deep-seated anxiety among the working class. The economic stagnation and high unemployment rates in South Africa provide a fertile ground for such rhetoric to flourish. When people feel that their livelihoods are threatened, they are more likely to support radical solutions, even if those solutions involve extrajudicial actions at the border. The challenge for the state is to address these legitimate concerns about border security without succumbing to the pressure of vigilante groups that operate outside the rule of law.
It is also worth noting that the movement is not operating in a vacuum. The political landscape is crowded with various factions and parties, all vying for the attention of a frustrated electorate. The Patriotic Alliance, in particular, has been vocal about its stance on immigration, often echoing the sentiments of groups like March and March. This alignment creates a powerful political bloc that can influence policy decisions and force the government to take a harder line on migration. However, this approach carries significant risks, including the potential for increased violence and the alienation of neighboring countries that are critical partners in the Southern African Development Community.
As we look toward the remainder of 2026, the question of whether a border shutdown will actually materialize remains the central point of contention. Some analysts argue that the group's threats are primarily performative, designed to maintain visibility and keep their supporters engaged. Others warn that the group has demonstrated a capacity for sustained action and that their ability to mobilize at key locations should not be underestimated. The incident involving a Pakistani national arrested in Johannesburg over a stolen vehicle bound for Zimbabwe serves as a reminder of the complex web of criminal activity that often intersects with the broader issue of migration. Such events are frequently used by anti-immigration groups to justify their actions and to paint all foreigners with the same brush.
Ultimately, the situation is a reflection of a society grappling with its own identity and the challenges of globalization. The tension between the need for secure borders and the humanitarian obligations of a modern state is a struggle that many nations face, but in South Africa, it is compounded by a legacy of inequality and social fragmentation. The actions of March and March are a symptom of a deeper malaise, one that requires more than just police intervention to resolve. It requires a comprehensive national dialogue that addresses the root causes of the frustration, including economic policy, service delivery, and the management of migration in a way that is both fair and effective.
What happens next will likely depend on the government's response. If the state continues to be perceived as ineffective or indifferent, the vacuum will continue to be filled by groups that promise to take matters into their own hands. This is a dangerous path, as it undermines the authority of the state and risks further destabilizing an already fragile social fabric. The authorities must find a way to engage with the public's concerns while firmly upholding the law and protecting the rights of all individuals within the country's borders. It is a delicate balance, and one that will define the political trajectory of South Africa for the foreseeable future.
In conclusion, the potential for a border shutdown by March and March is a significant development that warrants close attention. It is a manifestation of the deep-seated anxieties that are currently shaping the political landscape in South Africa. Whether or not the shutdown occurs, the movement has already succeeded in bringing the issue of illegal immigration to the forefront of the national conversation. The challenge now is to ensure that this conversation leads to constructive policy outcomes rather than further division and conflict. The eyes of the nation and the international community are fixed on the border, waiting to see if the rhetoric will translate into action, and what the consequences of such an action might be for the stability of the region.
Published on July 11, 2026. Fact-checked and verified against referenced sources.
Associated Entities
A South African civic organisation focused on illegal immigration and border control.
A South African political party that aligns with anti-illegal immigration rhetoric.
The ruling political party in South Africa responsible for national policy.
Event Chronology
Establishment of March and March
The civic organisation is formed in South Africa with a focus on illegal immigration.
Clinic Gatekeeping Campaign
The group gains prominence by stationing volunteers at public health facilities to demand ID documents.
End of Clinic Gatekeeping
Leadership announces the conclusion of their campaign at government clinics and hospitals.
Escalation of Protests
Protests over illegal migration grow, leading to increased tensions and reports of immigrants leaving the country.
Border Shutdown Speculation
Media reports question whether the group will attempt to shut down the border with Zimbabwe.
Community Sentiment Poll
Broader Context
The emergence of movements like March and March within the South African sociopolitical landscape is not merely a reaction to the complexities of migration but a profound symptom of a nation grappling with the ghosts of its own transition. When we look at the rise of such civic organizations, we are forced to confront the reality that the post-apartheid promise of a rainbow nation is currently undergoing a painful, perhaps even violent, re-evaluation. The rhetoric of these groups, centered on the slogan Mabahambe, taps into a deep, visceral anxiety that has been percolating for decades. It is an anxiety born of the intersection between systemic economic stagnation and the perceived erosion of state authority. For many citizens, the border is no longer just a line on a map; it has become a symbolic boundary between survival and scarcity. This is the lens through which we must view the potential for a border shutdown. It is a desperate, performative act of reclaiming agency in a country where the average person often feels like a passenger in their own history.
One cannot help but notice the striking parallels between the current climate and the historical patterns of social unrest that have defined South Africa. The movement does not exist in a vacuum. It is the latest iteration of a long-standing tradition of vigilante-style activism that seeks to bypass the perceived lethargy of the state. When we consider the history of Operation Dudula, we see the same DNA of frustration and the same desire for immediate, tangible outcomes. The shift from monitoring clinics to threatening the integrity of international borders represents a significant escalation in the scope of this activism. It is a movement that has moved from the local to the national, from the hospital waiting room to the international transit point. This evolution suggests that the group is not satisfied with minor victories or symbolic gestures. They are seeking to force a national reckoning on the very definition of citizenship and belonging.
What is particularly fascinating about this phenomenon is how it forces us to reconsider the role of the state in the lives of its people. For years, the African National Congress has maintained a delicate balance between its pan-Africanist ideals and the practical demands of governing a country with massive inequality. The rise of anti-immigration sentiment is a direct challenge to that balance. It suggests that the state has failed to provide the security and economic stability that its citizens demand, and in that failure, it has created a power vacuum. Into this vacuum have stepped groups like March and March, offering a narrative that is simple, direct, and emotionally resonant. They are not offering complex policy solutions; they are offering a sense of order in a world that feels increasingly chaotic and unfair.
We must also consider the role of the media in amplifying these tensions. The way in which outlets like the Daily Maverick cover these events is crucial to understanding their impact. By framing the potential for a border shutdown as a major news event, the media inadvertently gives the movement a platform and a sense of legitimacy. This is not to say that the media is responsible for the unrest, but rather that the cycle of reporting and reaction creates a feedback loop that sustains the movement. Every headline about a potential shutdown, every interview with a spokesperson, and every analysis of the group's tactics serves to keep them at the center of the national conversation. It is a symbiotic relationship that benefits both the movement and the media, even as it deepens the divisions within society.
There is a profound sadness in watching this unfold. The history of South Africa is one of movement and migration, of people coming together from across the continent to build something new. To see that history now being weaponized against the very people who have contributed to the nation's growth is a tragedy of immense proportions. The xenophobia that underlies these protests is not just a political issue; it is a moral one. It challenges the very values of solidarity and human rights that were the foundation of the democratic transition. When we see people being turned away from hospitals or threatened at the border, we are seeing the erosion of the empathy that is necessary for any society to function.
Consider the specific case of the gatekeeping at Addington Hospital. This was not just a protest; it was an act of exclusion that had real-world consequences for the most vulnerable members of society. By demanding identification documents, the movement was effectively deciding who was worthy of care and who was not. This is a dangerous precedent. It suggests that the rights of the individual are secondary to the collective identity, and that the state's failure to enforce its laws justifies the actions of private citizens. This is the logic of the mob, and it is a logic that, once unleashed, is very difficult to contain.
We must also look at the economic context. South Africa is a country with one of the highest unemployment rates in the world. This economic reality is the fuel for the fire of xenophobia. When people are struggling to put food on the table, it is easy to blame the outsider for their plight. The narrative that immigrants are taking jobs and resources is a powerful one, even if it is not supported by the evidence. It is a narrative that provides a scapegoat for the failures of economic policy and the lack of opportunity. The challenge for the government is to address this economic anxiety without validating the xenophobic rhetoric that accompanies it.
This brings us to the role of the Patriotic Alliance. By aligning themselves with these movements, they are tapping into a vein of populist sentiment that is sweeping across the globe. It is a politics of resentment, one that thrives on the idea that the system is broken and that only a radical, exclusionary approach can fix it. This is not unique to South Africa. We see it in the rise of right-wing movements in Europe and the Americas. The difference is that in South Africa, the stakes are much higher, given the country's history of racial and social division. The potential for violence is always present, and the risk of destabilizing the region is real.
Let us pause and reflect on the nature of the border itself. The border between South Africa and Zimbabwe is a porous, complex space. It is a place of trade, family connection, and, yes, illegal movement. It is also a place where the state has historically struggled to exert control. To suggest that a group of citizens can simply walk up to the border and shut it down is a fantasy, but it is a powerful one. It speaks to a desire for control in a world that feels out of reach. It is a way of saying that we are still in charge, that we still have the power to decide who comes and who goes. This is the psychological power of the movement, and it is why it is so difficult to counter with facts and figures alone.
What happens if the shutdown actually occurs? The economic consequences would be immediate and severe. Trade would be disrupted, supply chains would be broken, and the flow of goods and services would be halted. This would hurt everyone, not just the immigrants. It would lead to higher prices, shortages of essential goods, and a further decline in the standard of living. And yet, for those who support the movement, this might be seen as a necessary sacrifice. It is a price they are willing to pay for the promise of a more secure and orderly society. This is the danger of populist movements; they often lead to outcomes that are contrary to the interests of the very people they claim to represent.
We must also consider the international reaction. South Africa is a key player in the Southern African Development Community. Its actions have ripple effects throughout the region. If it were to adopt a more aggressive, exclusionary stance on migration, it would damage its reputation and its relationships with its neighbors. It would also undermine the efforts to build a more integrated and prosperous Southern Africa. This is a risk that the government is clearly aware of, which is why it has been so cautious in its response. But caution can also be perceived as weakness, and that is exactly what the movement is counting on.
There is a deeper, more philosophical question at play here. What does it mean to be a citizen in the 21st century? Is it defined by birth, by documentation, or by a shared commitment to a set of values? The movement is pushing for a narrow, exclusionary definition of citizenship, one that is tied to national identity and the exclusion of the other. This is a challenge to the idea of a global, interconnected world. It is a retreat into the local, the familiar, and the exclusionary. And it is a challenge that we must all face, regardless of where we live.
Let us look at the incident involving the Pakistani national. This was a single event, but it was used to justify a broader, more aggressive stance. It is a classic example of how a single, isolated incident can be used to paint an entire group with the same brush. This is the power of the narrative. It doesn't matter if it is true or representative; it only matters that it is believable and that it reinforces the existing prejudices. This is the challenge of the modern information age, where the truth is often buried under a mountain of misinformation and emotional appeals.
We must also consider the role of the youth in this movement. Many of the people involved in these protests are young, unemployed, and disillusioned. They feel that they have been left behind by the promise of the new South Africa. They are looking for a way to make their voices heard, and the movement gives them a sense of purpose and belonging. This is a powerful motivator. It is not just about immigration; it is about identity, about pride, and about the desire to be part of something larger than oneself. This is why the movement is so resilient, and why it is so difficult to address with traditional political methods.
What is the alternative? How can we address the concerns of the people without succumbing to the politics of hate? It requires a new approach, one that is based on empathy, dialogue, and a commitment to the common good. It requires a government that is willing to listen to the concerns of its citizens, even when they are expressed in ways that are uncomfortable. It requires a society that is willing to engage in a difficult, honest conversation about the nature of its identity and the challenges of the future. This is not an easy path, but it is the only one that leads to a more just and inclusive society.
We must also recognize that the movement is not a monolith. There are many different voices within it, and there are many different motivations. Some are driven by genuine economic hardship, others by a sense of injustice, and others by a desire for power. To treat them all as the same is to miss the complexity of the situation. We need to understand the different threads that make up this tapestry, and we need to find ways to engage with each of them. This is the only way to build a sustainable solution.
Let us consider the role of the church and other civil society organizations. They have a vital role to play in fostering dialogue and building bridges between different communities. They can provide a space for people to come together and talk about their fears and their hopes. They can help to challenge the narratives of hate and to promote a more inclusive vision of the future. This is a role that they have played in the past, and it is a role that they must continue to play today.
We must also look at the role of the law. The law is the foundation of a just society, and it must be applied fairly and consistently. This means that we must protect the rights of all individuals, regardless of their nationality. It also means that we must hold those who break the law accountable, regardless of their political motivations. This is a difficult balance to strike, but it is essential for the rule of law to be maintained. If we allow the law to be bypassed in the name of a higher cause, we are opening the door to chaos and instability.
What about the future? The situation is likely to remain volatile for some time. The economic challenges are not going to disappear overnight, and the political tensions are likely to persist. The key will be how the government and the society as a whole respond. If we can find a way to address the root causes of the frustration, we can begin to move towards a more stable and prosperous future. If we continue to ignore the underlying issues, we are likely to see more of the same, and the divisions will only deepen.
Let us think about the language we use. The way we talk about these issues matters. If we use language that is dehumanizing and divisive, we are contributing to the problem. If we use language that is inclusive and respectful, we are part of the solution. We need to be mindful of the words we choose, and we need to be aware of the impact they have on others. This is a small thing, but it is a powerful one.
We must also consider the role of education. Education is the key to building a more tolerant and understanding society. It is through education that we can learn about the history of our country, the contributions of different cultures, and the importance of human rights. It is through education that we can learn to think critically and to question the narratives that are being fed to us. This is a long-term investment, but it is one that is essential for the future of our country.
Let us reflect on the idea of the global citizen. In a world that is increasingly interconnected, we are all part of a larger community. We have a responsibility to each other, and we have a responsibility to the planet. This is a challenging concept, but it is one that is necessary for our survival. We need to move beyond the narrow, nationalistic view of the world and embrace a more global perspective. This is not about losing our identity; it is about expanding it to include the rest of the world.
We must also consider the role of the arts and culture. The arts have the power to challenge our perceptions, to evoke empathy, and to bring people together. They can help us to see the world through the eyes of others, and they can help us to understand the complexities of the human experience. This is a vital role, and it is one that we should support and encourage.
Let us think about the role of the individual. Each one of us has a role to play in building a more just and inclusive society. We can start by being more aware of our own biases, by being more open to different perspectives, and by being more compassionate towards others. We can start by speaking out against hate and by standing up for the rights of all individuals. This is a small thing, but it is a powerful one.
We must also consider the role of the media in a more critical way. We need to be aware of the biases that exist in the media, and we need to be critical consumers of information. We need to seek out diverse perspectives and to verify the information we receive. This is a responsibility that we all share, and it is one that is essential for the health of our democracy.
Let us reflect on the idea of the common good. The common good is the idea that we are all in this together, and that we have a responsibility to work for the benefit of everyone. This is a challenging concept, but it is one that is essential for the survival of our society. We need to move beyond the narrow, individualistic view of the world and embrace a more collective perspective. This is not about losing our individuality; it is about recognizing that our well-being is tied to the well-being of others.
We must also consider the role of the government in a more critical way. We need to hold our leaders accountable, and we need to demand that they act in the best interests of all citizens. We need to be active participants in our democracy, and we need to make our voices heard. This is a responsibility that we all share, and it is one that is essential for the health of our democracy.
Let us think about the role of the future. The future is not something that just happens to us; it is something that we create. We have the power to shape the future, and we have the responsibility to make it a better one. This is a challenging task, but it is one that is worth the effort. We need to be bold, we need to be creative, and we need to be committed to the common good.
We must also consider the role of the past. The past is a teacher, and we have a lot to learn from it. We need to be honest about our history, and we need to acknowledge the mistakes that have been made. We need to learn from these mistakes, and we need to ensure that they are not repeated. This is a painful process, but it is one that is essential for the growth and development of our society.
Let us reflect on the idea of the human spirit. The human spirit is resilient, and it is capable of great things. It is through the human spirit that we can overcome the challenges that we face, and it is through the human spirit that we can build a better future. This is a source of hope, and it is a source of inspiration.
We must also consider the role of the environment. The environment is the foundation of our existence, and we have a responsibility to protect it. We need to be mindful of our impact on the planet, and we need to work towards a more sustainable future. This is a responsibility that we all share, and it is one that is essential for the survival of our species.
Let us think about the role of technology. Technology has the power to connect us, to inform us, and to empower us. It also has the power to divide us, to misinform us, and to control us. We need to be mindful of the way we use technology, and we need to ensure that it is used for the benefit of all. This is a responsibility that we all share, and it is one that is essential for the future of our society.
We must also consider the role of the economy. The economy is a tool, and it should be used to serve the needs of the people. We need to ensure that the economy is fair, that it is inclusive, and that it is sustainable. This is a responsibility that we all share, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
Let us reflect on the idea of justice. Justice is the foundation of a fair and equitable society. It is through justice that we can ensure that everyone is treated with dignity and respect. It is through justice that we can hold those who violate the rights of others accountable. This is a fundamental principle, and it is one that we must uphold at all costs.
We must also consider the role of the community. The community is the place where we live, where we work, and where we build our lives. It is the place where we connect with others, and where we support each other. We need to nurture our communities, and we need to ensure that they are inclusive and welcoming to all. This is a responsibility that we all share, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
Let us think about the role of the family. The family is the basic unit of society, and it is the place where we learn the values that guide our lives. We need to support our families, and we need to ensure that they are strong and healthy. This is a responsibility that we all share, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
We must also consider the role of the individual in the global context. We are all citizens of the world, and we have a responsibility to contribute to the well-being of the global community. We need to be aware of the challenges that are facing the world, and we need to work towards solutions that are fair and equitable. This is a responsibility that we all share, and it is one that is essential for the future of our planet.
Let us reflect on the idea of hope. Hope is the belief that things can get better, and it is the motivation that drives us to work for a better future. We need to hold onto hope, even in the darkest of times. We need to believe in our ability to make a difference, and we need to work towards a better world for all. This is a source of strength, and it is a source of inspiration.
We must also consider the role of the future generations. We have a responsibility to leave the world in a better state than we found it. We need to think about the impact of our actions on the future, and we need to make choices that are sustainable and responsible. This is a duty that we owe to those who will come after us, and it is one that we must take seriously.
Let us think about the role of the truth. The truth is the foundation of a free and open society. We need to be committed to the truth, and we need to be willing to challenge the lies and the misinformation that are being spread. We need to be critical thinkers, and we need to be informed citizens. This is a responsibility that we all share, and it is one that is essential for the health of our democracy.
We must also consider the role of the dialogue. Dialogue is the way we resolve our differences, and it is the way we build understanding. We need to be willing to listen to others, and we need to be willing to share our own perspectives. We need to be respectful, and we need to be open to the possibility that we might be wrong. This is a skill that we all need to develop, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
Let us reflect on the idea of the common humanity. We are all human, and we all share the same basic needs and desires. We all want to be loved, we all want to be respected, and we all want to live in peace. This is a fundamental truth, and it is one that we must never forget. If we can remember this, we can overcome the divisions that keep us apart, and we can build a better future for all.
We must also consider the role of the compassion. Compassion is the ability to understand and share the feelings of others. It is the foundation of kindness, and it is the key to building a more humane society. We need to be more compassionate, and we need to be more willing to help those who are in need. This is a responsibility that we all share, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
Let us think about the role of the courage. Courage is the ability to do what is right, even when it is difficult. It is the ability to stand up for our values, and it is the ability to challenge the status quo. We need to be more courageous, and we need to be more willing to take a stand for what we believe in. This is a quality that we all need to cultivate, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
We must also consider the role of the patience. Patience is the ability to wait for the right time, and it is the ability to persevere in the face of challenges. We need to be more patient, and we need to be more willing to work towards long-term goals. This is a virtue that we all need to practice, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
Let us reflect on the idea of the wisdom. Wisdom is the ability to see the big picture, and it is the ability to make good decisions. We need to be wiser, and we need to be more willing to learn from our experiences. This is a quality that we all need to strive for, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
We must also consider the role of the humility. Humility is the ability to recognize our own limitations, and it is the ability to learn from others. We need to be more humble, and we need to be more willing to admit when we are wrong. This is a quality that we all need to cultivate, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
Let us think about the role of the integrity. Integrity is the ability to be honest and true to our values. It is the foundation of trust, and it is the key to building strong relationships. We need to be more honest, and we need to be more willing to stand by our principles. This is a quality that we all need to uphold, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
We must also consider the role of the responsibility. Responsibility is the ability to take ownership of our actions, and it is the ability to be accountable for the impact we have on others. We need to be more responsible, and we need to be more willing to take action to make things better. This is a quality that we all need to embrace, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
Let us reflect on the idea of the unity. Unity is the ability to work together towards a common goal, and it is the ability to overcome our differences. We need to be more united, and we need to be more willing to support each other. This is a goal that we should all strive for, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
We must also consider the role of the freedom. Freedom is the ability to live our lives as we choose, and it is the ability to express ourselves freely. We need to protect our freedom, and we need to ensure that it is available to all. This is a fundamental right, and it is one that we must never take for granted.
Let us think about the role of the equality. Equality is the idea that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law, and it is the idea that everyone should have the same opportunities. We need to work towards a more equal society, and we need to ensure that everyone has a fair chance to succeed. This is a goal that we should all strive for, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
We must also consider the role of the peace. Peace is the absence of conflict, and it is the presence of harmony. We need to work towards a more peaceful world, and we need to ensure that we resolve our differences through dialogue and understanding. This is a goal that we should all strive for, and it is one that is essential for the health of our society.
Let us reflect on the idea of the love. Love is the most powerful force in the world, and it is the key to building a better future. We need to love each other, and we need to be more compassionate towards those who are different from us. This is a fundamental truth, and it is one that we must never forget. If we can remember this, we can overcome the divisions that keep us apart, and we can build a better future for all.
Sources & References
This briefing was compiled using data scraped from the following reputable news outlets and search indices:
-
Will March and March march over border for Zimbabwe ‘shutdown’? - The Citizen
Source: The Citizen
-
LIVE | Xenophobic unrest: July 2021 repeat avoided, but March and March say fight continues - Daily Maverick
Source: Daily Maverick
-
Immigrants are leaving South Africa as protests grow over illegal migration. Here's what to know - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
Source: ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos